jueves, 24 de octubre de 2013

Gathering and grading tests


In my experience as a student, I recall some subjects in which I  felt a little misjudged when I had to taake a test, as I considered that most of the times they were not intended to improve my process in a meaningful way, instead they were focused on giving blurred instructions which only purpose was to prove if I had a great comprehension of such instructions rather than figuring out what I really knew about certain topic and that way to show my skills properly. So, this experience has made me realized that teachers sometimes forget about the fact that tests are just other tools to enhance the students learning.

We need to make sure that the things we are doing in the classroom can be reflected when giving tests; then it is our responsibility to design a test that takes into account student´s general comprehension in terms of instructions, this way they will decide on the time required to complete the tasks; also, it is important that the order of such tasks helps them do better; according to the chapter there are some steps to the organizing of blocks, such as, efficiency order, in which students can gain a great number of points in the least amount of time, and  facility order  which means the tasks we think the will perform better, should go first in the test. Then difficulty order and reactive ordering should go after, as students can figure our harder tasks since they will feel more relaxed. 


In terms of the score, students should be aware of the aspects to be tested, and we need to create certain standards to avoid being subjective. In conclusion, the most significant thing for me, is that we learn how to assess our tests, and also that we consider it just as another way to observe the students, keeping in mind that we make use of other kinds of assessment necessary to gather more information about the student´s performance and development.

jueves, 3 de octubre de 2013


"SHOW ME THE MONEY!"

It is not a secret that educational systems around the world are such huge businesses; Colombia is linked of course to all these interests. When I think about standardized tests, I cannot help thinking that the purpose of all those exams is indeed monetary. How it is possible that an educational system should be tested at least four different times during a 12-years academic period? This amount of tests taking means two things to me, one, as I already mention, money for the people behind the system, also because not only students are the ones who take standardized tests, teachers must take tests in order to obtain a higher status In the scale; and two, the lack of quality in education. I say the lack of quality education because if an educational system were optimum and with high quality should not be necessary to test so many times in order to check if people are getting the goals. In other words, if we know that our educational system is excellent taking so many tests will be not necessary. But no, we cannot trust in our educational system. Nevertheless, it is necessary to grade students and standardized tests are great tools for teachers as they set a clear path to follow when grading them and make measurement easier. Everything in life has its pros and cons, in sum standardized test are not all bad, in fact they are very useful; the problem is that they have been increased just for the sake of making money.